Thank you.
I have seen demos in /usr/share/dolfin/demo and have tried running one
with>>python demo_auto-adaptive_poisson.pybut still getting a lot of error of
the formFile /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/....
How do I resolve this one.Thanks. Chinedu Nwaigwe
.
On Friday, December 19, 2014 12:09 PM, Jan Blechta
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 18:06:51 +0000 (UTC)
NWAIGWE CHINEDU <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear All,Kindly give me some clue on how to resolve this issue.I am
> new to FEniCS and just want to get started. I have just installed
> fenics on a virtual machine running ubuntu 12.x.I created a folder
> called fenics on my home directory.In the fenics directory, I created
> a file called d1_p2D.py containing the first code on the FEniCS
> tutorial.Then I tried to run using the following command >> python
> d1_p2D.pybut get the following error : RuntimeError: In
> instant.recompile: The module did not compile with comman 'make
> VERBOSE= 1',
> see /home/dir/.instant/error/dolfin_compile_..../compile.log Please
> what do I do?
FEniCS tutorial is deprecated. Please, start over with FEniCS
documented demos
http://fenicsproject.org/documentation/dolfin/1.4.0/python/demo/index.html
Jan
>
> Thanks,
> Chinedu Nwaigwe
>
> On Sunday, December 14, 2014 8:02 PM, Johan Hake
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Ahh, will do!
> Johan
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Remember to also update test/unit/python/book/README with information
> about what was changed.
>
> --Anders
>
> Fri Dec 12 2014 at 4:31:41 PM skrev Martin Sandve Alnæs
> <[email protected]>:
>
> Sure. However with dof renumbering nobody should actually do that,
> you could just make a note about that too. On 12 December 2014 at
> 16:26, Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote: Ok, make sense.
> The alternative syntax would here be to use arange from numpy.
> b2 = b[arange(0, b.local_size(), 2)]
>
> Johan
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Martin Sandve Alnæs
> <[email protected]> wrote: The policy is to avoid it if possible.
> However I think this is a good case.It's a while since 1.0 now, some
> things will have to change over time. Just keep the line commented
> out, and add a comment like # This feature has been removed because
> it is unsafe in parallel:or something like that. Even better would be
> to add an alternative formulation, but I don't think that line makes
> much sense anyway? Martin
>
> On 12 December 2014 at 16:13, Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello!
> I am about to push the numpy index access for GenericVectors. As
> previously discussed I will remove support for slicing access. This
> breaks one book example. What is the policy for that? That was the
> whole point of having these tests there. def test_p51_box_2(): b =
> Vector(mpi_comm_world(), 10) c = Vector(mpi_comm_world(), 10)
> b_copy = b[:] b[:] = c b[b < 0] = 0 b2 = b[::2] The last
> line wont work. Johan _______________________________________________
> fenics mailing list [email protected]
> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fenics mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
