On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 19:21:19 +0000 (UTC) NWAIGWE CHINEDU <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thank you. > I have seen demos in /usr/share/dolfin/demo and have tried running > one with>>python demo_auto-adaptive_poisson.pybut still getting a lot > of error of the formFile /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/.... How do > I resolve this one.Thanks. Chinedu Nwaigwe . You did not submit sufficient information for getting helped. Please, follow instructions on http://fenicsproject.org/support. Jan > > On Friday, December 19, 2014 12:09 PM, Jan Blechta > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 18:06:51 +0000 (UTC) > NWAIGWE CHINEDU <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dear All,Kindly give me some clue on how to resolve this issue.I am > > new to FEniCS and just want to get started. I have just installed > > fenics on a virtual machine running ubuntu 12.x.I created a folder > > called fenics on my home directory.In the fenics directory, I > > created a file called d1_p2D.py containing the first code on the > > FEniCS tutorial.Then I tried to run using the following command > > >> python d1_p2D.pybut get the following error : RuntimeError: In > > instant.recompile: The module did not compile with comman 'make > > VERBOSE= 1', > > see /home/dir/.instant/error/dolfin_compile_..../compile.log Please > > what do I do? > > FEniCS tutorial is deprecated. Please, start over with FEniCS > documented demos > http://fenicsproject.org/documentation/dolfin/1.4.0/python/demo/index.html > > Jan > > > > > Thanks, > > Chinedu Nwaigwe > > > > On Sunday, December 14, 2014 8:02 PM, Johan Hake > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Ahh, will do! > > Johan > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> > > wrote: Remember to also update test/unit/python/book/README with > > information about what was changed. > > > > --Anders > > > > Fri Dec 12 2014 at 4:31:41 PM skrev Martin Sandve Alnæs > > <[email protected]>: > > > > Sure. However with dof renumbering nobody should actually do that, > > you could just make a note about that too. On 12 December 2014 at > > 16:26, Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote: Ok, make sense. > > The alternative syntax would here be to use arange from numpy. > > b2 = b[arange(0, b.local_size(), 2)] > > > > Johan > > > > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Martin Sandve Alnæs > > <[email protected]> wrote: The policy is to avoid it if possible. > > However I think this is a good case.It's a while since 1.0 now, some > > things will have to change over time. Just keep the line commented > > out, and add a comment like # This feature has been removed because > > it is unsafe in parallel:or something like that. Even better would > > be to add an alternative formulation, but I don't think that line > > makes much sense anyway? Martin > > > > On 12 December 2014 at 16:13, Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello! > > I am about to push the numpy index access for GenericVectors. As > > previously discussed I will remove support for slicing access. This > > breaks one book example. What is the policy for that? That was the > > whole point of having these tests there. def test_p51_box_2(): b > > = Vector(mpi_comm_world(), 10) c = Vector(mpi_comm_world(), 10) > > b_copy = b[:] b[:] = c b[b < 0] = 0 b2 = b[::2] The last > > line wont work. Johan > > _______________________________________________ fenics mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > fenics mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
