Not a big deal for me. But personally I get somewhat confused with year, month versioning numbers, a la Ubuntu and such. But then that is probably just me :P
Johan On Monday August 15 2011 07:15:47 Anders Logg wrote: > We've started on this discussion before but have never come to a > conclusion. > > What version numbers should we use for FEniCS itself and the > individual packages? > > Before, we have let all packages have their own version numbers, and > then released FEniCS yy--mm (like 2011-06, 2011-12 etc) containing a > collection of the other packages with some specific (but unrelated) > version numbers. > > Another option is to use the same version numbers for all packages, > including FEniCS itself. > > The question comes up now and needs to be resolved since Johannes is > about to create a release of the meta-package fenics, either 1.0-beta > or 2011-08. > > Thoughts? > > -- > Anders > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
