On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Martin Sandve Alnæs <[email protected]> wrote: > On 16 August 2011 11:59, Kent-Andre Mardal <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On 16 August 2011 11:57, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:28:53AM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote: >>> > Agree with Kent. For example UFL and UFC will hopefully be more stable >>> > than DOLFIN. >>> > >>> > FEniCS-2011-08 does not sound like a beta though, >>> > can it be FEniCS-2011-08-beta? Or FEniCS-2011-09-beta >>> > since the final will likely be FEniCS-2011-09? >>> >>> One possibility that Johannes has suggested is to let the FEniCS >>> package number follow the DOLFIN package number. For most users, that >>> is the most interesting number. >>> >> >> Sounds good to me. >> Kent > > Ok! > > Martin
Ok, I'm preparing the new packages as fenics-1.0-beta then. Johannes _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
