On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 01:58:50PM +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Martin Sandve Alnæs > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 16 August 2011 11:59, Kent-Andre Mardal <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 16 August 2011 11:57, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:28:53AM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote: > >>> > Agree with Kent. For example UFL and UFC will hopefully be more stable > >>> > than DOLFIN. > >>> > > >>> > FEniCS-2011-08 does not sound like a beta though, > >>> > can it be FEniCS-2011-08-beta? Or FEniCS-2011-09-beta > >>> > since the final will likely be FEniCS-2011-09? > >>> > >>> One possibility that Johannes has suggested is to let the FEniCS > >>> package number follow the DOLFIN package number. For most users, that > >>> is the most interesting number. > >>> > >> > >> Sounds good to me. > >> Kent > > > > Ok! > > > > Martin > > Ok, I'm preparing the new packages as fenics-1.0-beta then.
Sounds good! -- Anders _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
