On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 6:17 PM Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 5:17 PM James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 7/19/2024 12:31 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> > Internal/private filter structures/API changes does not need be >> mentioned >> > in that file, isn't that fact obvious even for average Joe? >> >> There's no reason to be condescending or aggressive over something so >> irrelevant. Is it so hard to just state the APIChanges entry is not >> needed? >> >> I'm writing this representing the CC. This is not the only case you were >> pointlessly aggressive to someone in the past week or so. Consider it a >> warning before further action is taken. >> > > Gebels is proud of you. > Also you are not supporting any free speech whatsoever. Also you are extremely selective and biased in your judging. Also you are part of the problem. I'm also happy spectator of very slow death of this project from now on. > > >> _______________________________________________ >> ffmpeg-devel mailing list >> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org >> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel >> >> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email >> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". >> > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
