On 23 April 2018 at 10:27, Thomas Volkert <si...@gmx.net> wrote: > On 22.04.2018 20:03, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > 2018-04-22 20:00 GMT+02:00, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org>: > >> Carl Eugen Hoyos (2018-04-22): > >>> How do you detect that this is not the "current version" of mbed? > >> Is it really our responsibility? > > We try to always do it and I believe that allowing LGPL makes > > more sense and less headache: Since we do the checks so > > rigorously it makes sense to assume we did it as correctly > > for this case. > > > > I don't understand why we don't go the easy way that clearly > > has advantages instead for the complicated way (with at > > least some disadvantages). > > Okay. I looked over their web page and the Debian packages again. > The web page of mbedTLS declares Apache license as the "primary open > source license". > > I will add it to EXTERNAL_LIBRARY_VERSION3_LIST and push it today, if > their are no further objections. > > Best regards, > Thomas. > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel >
I'd like some memory usage and performance comparisons to gnutls and openssl before you push. This is the 6th (!!) TLS library we'd be supporting. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel