On 23 April 2018 at 20:16, Thomas Volkert <si...@gmx.net> wrote: > > On 23.04.2018 11:27, Thomas Volkert wrote: > > On 22.04.2018 20:03, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > >> 2018-04-22 20:00 GMT+02:00, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org>: > >>> Carl Eugen Hoyos (2018-04-22): > >>>> How do you detect that this is not the "current version" of mbed? > >>> Is it really our responsibility? > >> We try to always do it and I believe that allowing LGPL makes > >> more sense and less headache: Since we do the checks so > >> rigorously it makes sense to assume we did it as correctly > >> for this case. > >> > >> I don't understand why we don't go the easy way that clearly > >> has advantages instead for the complicated way (with at > >> least some disadvantages). > > Okay. I looked over their web page and the Debian packages again. > > The web page of mbedTLS declares Apache license as the "primary open > > source license". > > > > I will add it to EXTERNAL_LIBRARY_VERSION3_LIST and push it today, if > > their are no further objections. > > pushed > > Best regards, > Thomas. > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel >
Sorry, had to revert, I'd still like to know what gains (disk space, performance, maybe security-wise too if possible), this would have over existing TLS libraries. Code-wise it looked fine. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel