On 4/23/2018 6:27 AM, Thomas Volkert wrote: > On 22.04.2018 20:03, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> 2018-04-22 20:00 GMT+02:00, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org>: >>> Carl Eugen Hoyos (2018-04-22): >>>> How do you detect that this is not the "current version" of mbed? >>> Is it really our responsibility? >> We try to always do it and I believe that allowing LGPL makes >> more sense and less headache: Since we do the checks so >> rigorously it makes sense to assume we did it as correctly >> for this case. >> >> I don't understand why we don't go the easy way that clearly >> has advantages instead for the complicated way (with at >> least some disadvantages). > > Okay. I looked over their web page and the Debian packages again. > The web page of mbedTLS declares Apache license as the "primary open > source license". > > I will add it to EXTERNAL_LIBRARY_VERSION3_LIST and push it today, if > their are no further objections.
Not only there was an objection/request by Rostislav Pehlivanov you ignored, you also pushed this after ONE day in the ml, with absolutely no review. What exactly was the hurry? Please, revert this. Forcing your way through is not how code should be committed. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
