Martin Vignali wrote: >But maybe to make tests simpler, we can use/add bit exact >conversion for uint8 to float, we can generate a LUT without >float calc and for uint16 to float, we can add a uint16 to >float conversion without float calc, or maybe, generate a LUT >in bit exact mode (probably faster, if it's acceptable to have >a LUT for 16bit entries)
In my experience, a LUT in bit exact mode is indeed faster. To me the proposed addition would be useful. And I guess LUTs for 16-bit entries will become necessary anyway at some point... Thank you! Reto _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
