On 18/05/11 15:40, Jeff Licquia wrote: > [...] > OpenBSD was involved as well: > > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=130499860531930&w=4 > > The conclusion, all around, was that *BSD wasn't interested in the FHS.
Hi, Jeff. Actually, I think it should be the other way around: The FHS should be interested in how *BSD filesystems are configured, because the FHS is intended to be a platform independent standard for Posix-like systems. Bye, Tony. _______________________________________________ fhs-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss
