On Tue, 17 May 2011 17:33:58 +0200 Bruno Cornec <[email protected]> wrote:
> Martin Baehr said on Tue, May 17, 2011 at 05:16:25PM +0200: > > > i get the impression however that compared to the FHS these > > documents are much more descriptive and not prescriptive. they > > simply document the existing structure and don't set rules. > > Do you think it could be worth to work on a compliance script ? I > find a standard without tool to support them less usefull. I know lsb have some stuff, but i've never looked for it. I did notice [1] while poking around on the web and i found it quite interesting. [1] http://developer.novell.com/devnet/yes/linux/suse/standard.html thanks, kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fhs-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss
