On Wed, 25 May 2011 08:56:30 +0200 Martin Baehr <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 09:08:51AM +1000, Karl Goetz wrote: > > If we decide this is linux specific, then thats fine. If its meant > > to be wider scope i tend to feel it should be hosted elseware. (if > > only provided as the canonical location elseware). > > actually, given that the FHS andthe hier manpage target different > people the manpage is for endusers/admins while FHS is for > distributors and application developers, i think i would be good to > have a reduced version in hier that removes all non-linux bits and > maybe even allows customization to match the distributors actual > choices. Not sure if I follow you, but we agree hier should match what is being provided by the distributor? If thats the case, I don't see a reason to include the fhs specifically in the install, just reference its location on the web (or include it in a package like debian-policy ;)) thanks, kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fhs-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss
