On 21-06-19 15:19, Mats Wichmann wrote:
On 6/21/19 2:23 AM, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, Mats Wichmann wrote:
With FHS not very active it's hard to describe a full process. For
editorial changes judgement can just be applied; for a substantive
change that requires some consensus we can try to collect that but it's
hard to say when "enough" has been achieved.
The process should, however, always include a bug filed at
bugs.linuxfoundation.org in the FHS category.
I created https://bugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1439
But if I look at the open bugs, I don't think that there will ever
something happen.
With all the changes going on in the Linux distribution world, we
should really somehow revive it again, else we will be back in
the pre-FHS time, and the FHS is then the reason for it.
Thorsten
Linux Foundation still hosts the infrastructure, and the spec sources
are on github (https://github.com/LinuxStandardBase/fhs-spec). There
are people who will work on moving it forward - if there's interest and
participation. As you have seen from the level of activity, there
hasn't been much interest since FHS 3 was published four years ago.
_______________________________________________
fhs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss
So, the question is "how to raise interest". And if there is none, does
this imply that we are stuck with an old specification with no hope of
going forward?
-- Frans.
_______________________________________________
fhs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss
