On Fri, Jun 21, Frans de Boer wrote: > On 21-06-19 15:19, Mats Wichmann wrote:
> > Linux Foundation still hosts the infrastructure, and the spec sources > > are on github (https://github.com/LinuxStandardBase/fhs-spec). There > > are people who will work on moving it forward - if there's interest and > > participation. As you have seen from the level of activity, there > > hasn't been much interest since FHS 3 was published four years ago. > So, the question is "how to raise interest". And if there is none, does this > imply that we are stuck with an old specification with no hope of going > forward? I think there is still interest. If you look at the mail archive and bugzilla, there are people who wanted to have changes or clarifications, but with the answers they got (choose anything yourself or wait for the next FHS version), I think most people gave up and declared FHS for dead. I for example was neither aware about the github project nor that people are looking for participation. If you search for FHS, the first hits you get are the wikipedia articles ... Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk, Distinguished Engineer, Senior Architect SLES & MicroOS SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah, HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg) _______________________________________________ fhs-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss
