At linuxfromscratch we follow the LSB/FHS closely.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/prologue/standards.html
There are some minor things that we would change (e.g. remove ed), but
LFS is designed primarily as a learning project, even though it has been
the basis of some production systems.
We would like FHS to remain relevant so those that learn from us will
have a good resource for the organization of Unix and Linux systems.
-- Bruce
On 6/21/19 2:22 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Hi Thorsten,
Thorsten Kukuk wrote on Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 08:07:57PM +0200:
I think the first question would be: who is following the FHS? If this
are only Linux distributions, the question is already answered.
OpenBSD is an example of an actively maintained non-Linux system
that effectively more or less follows the FHS, with a small number
of minor violations:
* /boot is an executable binary file rather than a directory
* /media /opt /srv are neither needed nor used
* /run is called /var/run instead
* dmesg mknod are in /sbin rather than /bin
* false and true are builtins to all shells and in /usr/bin
* login more sed su gzip netstat are in /usr/bin
* mount and umount are in /sbin
* ping is in /sbin
* /etc/opt is neither needed nor used
* /usr/lib/sendmail no longer exists
* /usr/local/etc /usr/local/src are neither needed nor used
* /var/lib local lock opt are neither needed nor used
* /var/tmp is a symbolic link to /tmp
Yours,
Ingo
_______________________________________________
fhs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss
_______________________________________________
fhs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss
