Farzan S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As a statistician, I must agree with David. Really, this is a futile > exercise and drawing conclusions based on it would be a mistake. Oh, come on. If that's the only "right" attitude we might as well all unsubscribe from the mailing list because any information we might glean here is questionable and not worth risking. Rob ==================================================================== The filmscanners mailing list is hosted by http://www.halftone.co.uk To resign, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS in the title, or UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS_DIGEST if you are reading the Digest.
- re[2]: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scans Alan Womack
- RE: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scans jowilcox
- RE: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scans Hemingway, David J
- Re: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scans bjs
- Update re "grain" testing Rob Geraghty
- Re: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scans Rob Geraghty
- Re: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scans Arthur Entlich
- Re: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scans Arthur Entlich
- RE: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scans Farzan S
- Re: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scans Rob Geraghty
- OT: Some interesting info about Photoshop Scratch ... Arthur Entlich
- Re: OT: Some interesting info about Photoshop ... photoscientia
- Re: OT: Some interesting info about Goldfi... Arthur Entlich
- Re: Some interesting info about Photoshop Scra... sirius
- RE: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scans Rob Geraghty
- Re: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scans Zeuspaul
- Re: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scans Rob Geraghty
- Re: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scan... Zeuspaul
- Re: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 ... Rob Geraghty