> Wasn't Alan Turing, the mathematician and 'father' of computer science, a > scientist? No, he was a mathematician. Early computers did not use 8 bit words. > This is like Philips' argument of limiting the sampling rate of CD audio to 44.1 KHz. > Theoretically it's all you need, but to many people CD quality sounds pretty > rough. If you (or anyone) believes CD 'quality' sounds rough, I assure you it has nothing to do with the sample rate. Spend a few bucks and buy a well designed CD player and you will 'discover' that 44.1 kHz works just fine.
- Re: filmscanners: Ch... Jonathan Buzzard
- Re: filmscanners... Roman Kielich®
- Re: filmscanners: Chemica... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Chemica... Jim Snyder
- Re: filmscanners: Chemical Fi... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Chemica... Roman Kielich®
- Re: filmscanners: Ch... Jonathan Buzzard
- Re: filmscanners: Chemical Fi... photoscientia
- Re: filmscanners: Chemica... Roman Kielich®
- Re: filmscanners: Chemical Film Resolution... Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: Chemical Film Resolution... Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Chemical Film Resol... Hugo Gävert
- Re: filmscanners: Chemical Film Resol... James Baxley
- measurement vs perception, was filmsc... Dave King
- RE: filmscanners: Chemical Film Resol... Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Chemical Film Resolution... Austin Franklin
- filmscanners: RE:scientific method shAf
- RE: filmscanners: RE:scientific m... Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: RE:scientif... johnprendergast.freeserve.co.uk
- Re: filmscanners: RE:scie... Jim Linch
- RE: filmscanners: RE... Lawrence Smith