> > > Wasn't Alan Turing, the mathematician and 'father' of computer science, a > > > scientist? > > > No, he was a mathematician. Early computers did not use 8 bit words. > And mathematicians are not scientists?!?!?!?!?!?! No, they are not. Some may happen to be both, but being a mathematician does not make you a scientist, and being a scientist does not make you a mathematician. They are entirely different disciplines and fields.
- Re: filmscanners: Chemica... Roman Kielich®
- Re: filmscanners: Ch... Jonathan Buzzard
- Re: filmscanners: Chemical Fi... photoscientia
- Re: filmscanners: Chemica... Roman Kielich®
- Re: filmscanners: Chemical Film Resolution... Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: Chemical Film Resolution... Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Chemical Film Resol... Hugo Gävert
- Re: filmscanners: Chemical Film Resol... James Baxley
- measurement vs perception, was filmsc... Dave King
- RE: filmscanners: Chemical Film Resol... Tony Sleep
- filmscanners: RE:scientific method Austin Franklin
- filmscanners: RE:scientific method shAf
- RE: filmscanners: RE:scientific m... Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: RE:scientif... johnprendergast.freeserve.co.uk
- Re: filmscanners: RE:scie... Jim Linch
- RE: filmscanners: RE... Lawrence Smith
- RE: filmscanners... Tony Sleep
- filmscanners: Sc... Felipe Monaco Villano
- Re: filmscanners... Santiago G.H.
- Re: filmscanners... OK Photo
- filmscanners: A ... Tim Mimpriss