Thank you very much for this important infos. I will wait till beginning of
year to see what happens with a Nikon 4000 DPI

Regards

Thierry Zysman

> De : "D. John Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Répondre à : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date : Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:12:59 -0800
> À : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Objet : Re: filmscanners: infos on Nikon LS 2000 or Microtek 4000T
> 
> Check out http://www.halftone.co.uk for reviews. The Nikon LS 2000
> andMicrotek 4000T are considered by many to be the best 35mm scanners under
> $2K. Kodak has a new scanner, the RFS 3600
> (http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/scanners/rfs3600/3600I
> ntro.shtml) which could be competative and Nikon has a rumored LS-3000
> (4000dpi 3.6 DMax) scanner which is suppose to appear this December or
> January.
> 
> John Anderson
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thierry ZYSMAN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 12:23 PM
> Subject: filmscanners: infos on Nikon LS 2000 or Microtek 4000T
> 
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I am a graphist based in Tahiti. It is pretty difficult to get infos when
>> you are in the middle of the South Pacific.
>> 
>> I have a Book on local fauna to publish with more than 600 scans (most of
>> them are 10 x 7 cm). I hope to buy a filmscanner to scan the Provia fuji
>> slides. Someone talk about a Nikon LS 2000, others on Microtek 4000T
>> 
>> Somebody can help me in the choice with infos, comments; etc... ?
>> 
>> Sorry for my bad english
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> 
>> Thierry Zysman
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to