From: Frank Paris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I would not get a cheap card. A terrific 2D card is the Matrox 450. It has > 32 Megs, has a 360 MHz DAC > > > > What, in the opinion of this group, is the best video > > card available for photoshop? I've been told by some that for > > this purpose a cheap 2d 8meg card will work as well as a high end > > 3d 32meg card since the high end cards are designed primarily for games. It takes some time to update my screen in PS6. (On a PC with enough RAM and a PIII processsor.) Is it my no name (2D, 8 MB shared) graphics card? Or? How big a graphics card is needed for a 1024 x 768 screen resolution? -Mikkel [a know-nothing-about graphics card]...
- Re: filmscanners: infos on Nikon LS 2000 or Microtek 4000T Red Dwarf
- RE: filmscanners: infos on Nikon LS 2000 or Microtek 4000T Mike
- RE: filmscanners: infos on Nikon LS 2000 or Microtek 4... Frank Paris
- RE: filmscanners: infos on Nikon LS 2000 or Microtek 4... Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: infos on Nikon LS 2000 or Microt... Mike
- RE: filmscanners: infos on Nikon LS 2000 or Mi... Frank Paris
- filmscanners: Ed's VueScan site Tim Atherton
- Re: filmscanners: Graphics card Mikkel Høj
- Re: filmscanners: Graphics card Larry Berman
- RE: filmscanners: Graphics card Frank Paris
- RE: filmscanners: Graphics card Larry Berman
- RE: filmscanners: Graphics card (simple Q) [wa... Frank Paris
- Re: filmscanners: Graphics card (simple Q) [wa... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Graphics card (simple Q) [wa... photoscientia
- Re: filmscanners: infos on Nikon LS 2000 or Mi... Richard
- Re: filmscanners: infos on Nikon LS 2000 or Microtek 4... Arthur Entlich
- filmscanners: newbie at scanning..... Lynda Farabee
- Re: filmscanners: newbie at scanning..... Rob Geraghty