On Tue, 9 Jan 2001 17:24:51 -0500 Austin Franklin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > That doesn't take into account the performance of the CCD, or the analog > front end, or the actual converter performance. Do you have any idea if the > manufacturers actually do any testing to conclude that what they claim as a > spec, is how the system actually performs? If they are basing their specs > on purely empirical data, then they are not, in my book, really accurate > specs. Quite right, and that's why OD specs are practically meaningless marketing bullets - you never know whether they are measured somehow, or simple estimations of the max OD range which can be crammed into available bit depth. Even where measurement has been done, there are no agreed standards which would confer comparability. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: f... photoscientia
- RE: So it's the bits? (Was: f... Austin Franklin
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: f... Julian Robinson
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: f... photoscientia
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: f... Julian Robinson
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: f... bjs
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: ... photoscientia
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web site ..... Frank Paris
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web site ..... EdHamrick
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web si... Austin Franklin
- Dynamic range solved was Re: filmscanners: Sprints... Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web site ..... Hemingway, David J
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web site ..... Henry Richardson
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web site ..... Hemingway, David J
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web site ..... Hemingway, David J