Rob writes ... > > Ed wrote: > >log10(2^13) = 3.913 > >log10(2^14) = 4.214 > > Thanks, Ed! I remember Tony saying many times that there > was no standard way of calculating DR from scanners, > but it looks like the manufacturers have simply > used the mathematics based on the bits from the A/D. > ... Keep in mind ... just because the bit depth allows for greater optical density, it doesn't mean that noise or some other CCD problem is the weak link in the practical application of the scanner's optical density. shAf :o)
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: f... Julian Robinson
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: f... photoscientia
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: f... Julian Robinson
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: f... bjs
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: ... photoscientia
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web site ..... Frank Paris
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web site ..... EdHamrick
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web si... Austin Franklin
- Dynamic range solved was Re: filmscanners: Sprints... Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web site ..... Hemingway, David J
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web site ..... Henry Richardson
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web site ..... Hemingway, David J
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web site ..... Hemingway, David J