I don't know why I didn't think of this before - purportedly the LS30 and LS2000 are exactly the same hardware but with different BIOS chips. If this is so, could someone with an LS2000 do a test? Set Nikonscan to 8 bit output instead of 16 bit output, make sure that ICE and colour management are on and try a few scans with high contrast edges? Unless I'm much mistaken, this would effectively put the LS2000 into a mode very similar (but not identical to) the LS30. I want to see if the LS2000 gets jaggies in this mode. If the data transfer to the LS30 sets up a vibration in the hardware, setting the LS2000 to similar output ought to create the same vibration. Has anyone tried this? If it does generate jaggies on the LS2000 it would be nice corroboration of the issue to report to Nikon. Rob Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wordweb.com
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's ... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's ... photoscientia
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Ray Amos
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Rob Geraghty
- SV: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Ingemar Lindahl
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Viacheslav Zilberfayn
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Frank Paris
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? photoscientia
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Rob Geraghty