>No, they are claiming even more specifically ... and I quote from >http://www.klt.co.jp/Nikon/Press_Release/ls-4000.html >... >Density range 4.2 Interesting. A Nikon product data sheet for the 4000 ED and model comparison sheet, provided by Nikon at this past week's Mac World, both use the phrase "Dynamic Range" (and give 4.2). However the 8000 ED product sheet reads "Density range 4.2" (though the product comparison sheet that includes the 8000 ED states "Dynamic Range"). -- Bob Shomler http://www.shomler.com/gallery.htm
- filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Julian Robinson
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Julian Robinson
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Hersch Nitikman
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Mike Kersenbrock
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Bob Shomler
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Tony Sleep
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 ... photoscientia
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: Sprintscan... Tony Sleep
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: Sprint... Julian Robinson
- RE: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: Sprint... Austin Franklin
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: Sprint... Robert E. Wright
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: Sprint... Tony Sleep
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: Sprint... photoscientia
- RE: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: Sprint... Austin Franklin
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: Sprint... Julian Robinson