On Fri, 12 Jan 2001 12:22:47 +1100 Julian Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > In other words number of > bits does NOT define Dmax, it only defines what the best possible might > be. Odd, 'cos that was the point of the whole original argument :) IE that bit depth constrains maximum OD range in scanners where there is linear mapping of intensity. Which is pretty much all of the ones any of us use. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's t... Mike Kersenbrock
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's t... Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's t... Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's t... Bob Shomler
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's t... Tony Sleep
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners... photoscientia
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: filmsca... Tony Sleep
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: fil... Julian Robinson
- RE: So it's the bits? (Was: fil... Austin Franklin
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: fil... Robert E. Wright
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: fil... Tony Sleep
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: fil... photoscientia
- RE: So it's the bits? (Was: fil... Austin Franklin
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: fil... Julian Robinson
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: fil... photoscientia
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: fil... Julian Robinson
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: fil... bjs
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: Sp... photoscientia
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web site ... Frank Paris
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web site ... EdHamrick
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web site... Austin Franklin