On Fri, 12 Jan 2001 18:21:18 -0500 Austin Franklin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > The scanner manufacturers use Dmax as a specification item Used by itself like this, it would be a statment of noise level - ie any higher DMax will be lost in noise, it being below the scanners ability to discriminate. But I think Leaf probably meant to say OD range = 3.7, as most mfr's specify this parameter, meaningless though it is without qualification. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? shAf
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? shAf
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Bob Shomler
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Tony Sleep
- filmscanners: Vuescan 6.4.8 problems with Canosca... Tony Sleep
- filmscanners: Vuescan 6.4.8 problems with Canosca... Richard
- Re: filmscanners: Vuescan 6.4.8 problems with Can... Dean Brown
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- filmscanners: 1:1024 range 8-bit linearly encoded Rick Trelles
- Re: filmscanners: 1:1024 range 8-bit linearly enc... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: 1:1024 range 8-bit linearly enc... Rick Trelles
- Re: filmscanners: 1:1024 range 8-bit linearly enc... Rick Trelles
- Re: filmscanners: 1:1024 range 8-bit linearly enc... Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? rafeb