On Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:06:58 -0500 Rick Trelles ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > The voltage ratio is already mapped to the DAC imput range (0-2V or > other) in the 1:1024 innitial example. Just exchange its 10-bit > 0-1023 DAC with an 8-bit 0-255 one with the same imput range. > Output data hardly different than with the digital convertion > above. We are going round in circles now. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bi... Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bi... Tony Sleep
- filmscanners: Vuescan 6.4.8 problems... Richard
- Re: filmscanners: Vuescan 6.4.8 prob... Dean Brown
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bi... Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bi... Austin Franklin
- filmscanners: 1:1024 range 8-bit lin... Rick Trelles
- Re: filmscanners: 1:1024 range 8-bit... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: 1:1024 range 8-bit... Rick Trelles
- Re: filmscanners: 1:1024 range 8-bit... Rick Trelles
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bi... Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? rafeb
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? photoscientia
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Ray Amos
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Rob Geraghty