Tony Sleep wrote: > > The Primefilm 1800 is the basis of the Kodak RFS3600, BTW. > I took a look at the Primefilm and immediately saw the lineage of the Kodak RSF3600. Other than color differences in the case, it is obvious where the design came from, and perhaps who is making the RFS3600 for Kodak. The open end design isn't a bad idea, as it allows for roll feed, and even scanning cine film frames and although I imagine it makes cleaning access simpler, it must also make dust access to the scan area easier. Art
- RE: filmscanners: EZ Prints monitor calibration Tim Victor
- filmscanners: Thoughts on Minolta Dimage Scan Dual I... Terry Carroll
- RE: filmscanners: Thoughts on Minolta Dimage Sca... Edwin Eleazer
- Re: filmscanners: Thoughts on Minolta Dimage... IronWorks
- RE: filmscanners: Thoughts on Minolta Di... Edwin Eleazer
- Re: filmscanners: Thoughts on Minol... IronWorks
- RE: filmscanners: Thoughts on Minolta Di... Edwin Eleazer
- RE: filmscanners: Primefilm 1800 (w... Tony Sleep
- Re(2): filmscanners: Primefilm ... Raymond Carles
- Re: Re(2): filmscanners: Pr... Tony Sleep
- Re(2): filmscanners: Primefilm ... Arthur Entlich
- Re(2): filmscanners: Primef... Raymond Carles
- Re: filmscanners: Cheap Nikons (was Thou... Tony Sleep
- filmscanners: Skin tones John Bradbury
- Re: filmscanners: Thoughts on Minolta Dimage Sca... Michael Schwager
- Re: filmscanners: Thoughts on Minolta Dimage Sca... gary williams
- Re: filmscanners: Thoughts on Minolta Dimage... Barbara Abel