"Larry Berman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Review of the new Nikon CoolScan 4000 at the Imaging Resource Newsletter: > http://www.imaging-resource.com/IRNEWS/ It reads more like a promotion than a review. The fact that they've never looked at the Polaroid 4000 or the Artix 4000 amazes me. To claim that Firewire is "essential" to produce a 67MB file in 100 seconds is silly. SCSI II can manage that in a few seconds, and I suspect USB would come close to getting under the 100 second mark. Hopefully someone will produce a more balanced review - hopefully comparing the Nikon 4000 with another 4000dpi scanner. Rob PS I have no doubt the Nikon 4000 is a nice scanner. :)
- Re: filmscanners: You have several hundred t... Derek Clarke
- RE: filmscanners: You have several hundr... Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: You have several hundred t... jimhayes
- Re: filmscanners: You have several hundred t... Raymond Carles
- Re: filmscanners: You have several hundred t... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: You have several hundr... Jeremy Nicholl
- Re: filmscanners: Grain Aliasing at 2700pppi Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: Grain Aliasing at 2700pppi Lynn Allen
- filmscanners: Review of the Nikon CoolScan 4000 Larry Berman
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Nikon CoolSc... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Nikon Co... Jeremy Brookfield
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Niko... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the... Tom Scales
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the... Jeremy Brookfield
- Re: filmscanners: Review of... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Review of... Gordon Tassi
- Re: filmscanners: Review of... Jeremy Brookfield
- Re: filmscanners: Review of... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Review of... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Nikon CoolSc... Mark T.