Rob Geraghty wrote: > "Jeremy Brookfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The software (Nikon Scan 3.0) is so buggy as to render the scanner useless > to > > all intents and purposes. > > Have you tried Vuescan? Does it work? Yes, it works quickly and (so far) reliably. Howver, I have difficulties with the color management. Nikon Scan 3 produces well balanced colour without manipulation. None of Vuescans 7.0.12 color balances comes even close to being reasonable. I also miss Nikon Scan's curve control (I have figured out how to use the new LCH dialog properly). Also I cannot find Vuescan's ICE GEM option (is there one?) With the LS2000, I prefered Silverfast to Nikon Scan 2.51 because of the better colour manipulation options. To sink further down to Vuescan's limited controls would not be acceptable to me. Jeremy
- Re: filmscanners: You have several hundred t... Raymond Carles
- Re: filmscanners: You have several hundred t... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: You have several hundr... Jeremy Nicholl
- Re: filmscanners: Grain Aliasing at 2700pppi Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: Grain Aliasing at 2700pppi Lynn Allen
- filmscanners: Review of the Nikon CoolScan 4000 Larry Berman
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Nikon CoolSc... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Nikon Co... Jeremy Brookfield
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Niko... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the... Tom Scales
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the... Jeremy Brookfield
- Re: filmscanners: Review of... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Review of... Gordon Tassi
- Re: filmscanners: Review of... Jeremy Brookfield
- Re: filmscanners: Review of... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Review of... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Nikon CoolSc... Mark T.
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Nikon Co... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Niko... Dave King
- aliasing was Re: filmscanners: ... Rob Geraghty
- Re: aliasing was Re: filmsc... Dave King