At 10:06 PM 6/04/01 -0400, you wrote: >Review of the new Nikon CoolScan 4000 at the Imaging Resource Newsletter: >http://www.imaging-resource.com/IRNEWS/ Interesting article, but I start to question it when I read: <quote> In all our prior film scanner reviews, the highest resolution we'd encountered was about 2800 dpi. Since film grain was fairly evident at that resolution, we felt there was little purpose in going to even higher resolutions, since we reasoned that would emphasize film grain even further. <endquote> Eeek. I thought grain-aliasing and film resolution was covered in either lesson 1 or 2 when you do Filmscanning 101..! :) And they haven't encountered 4000 dpi before...???? Maybe the full review will be better..
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Nikon CoolScan 4000 Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Nikon CoolScan 4... Jeremy Brookfield
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Nikon CoolSc... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Nikon Co... Tom Scales
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Nikon Co... Jeremy Brookfield
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Niko... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Niko... Gordon Tassi
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Niko... Jeremy Brookfield
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Niko... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Niko... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Nikon CoolScan 4000 Mark T.
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Nikon CoolScan 4... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Nikon CoolSc... Dave King
- aliasing was Re: filmscanners: Review of... Rob Geraghty
- Re: aliasing was Re: filmscanners: R... Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Nikon Co... Pat Perez
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Niko... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Niko... Mark T.
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Nikon Co... Michael Moore
- Re: filmscanners: Review of the Niko... Dave King
- RE: filmscanners: Review of the Nikon CoolSc... Dave Buyens