Rob Geraghty wrote: > > Dave wrote: > >Nikon scanners. Specifically, I'd like to find out whether scans > >performed *without* ICE on the new scanners have the same problems > >with excessive dust and scratches as on the old scanners, or if this > >has been improved, and if so, by how much. Hmmm... was the scanner *adding* the dust and scratches? I would rather have a scanner that gets as much info off of the film as possible, and if there are dust and scratches on the film, they should be resolved... I'm funny that way...;-) Isaac
- filmscanners: New Nikon performance Dave King
- RE: filmscanners: New Nikon performance shAf
- Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Arthur Entlich
- filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon per... Isaac Crawford
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon... Derek Clarke
- RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New N... shAf
- RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: ... Derek Clarke
- RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: ... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New N... Isaac Crawford
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: ... Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanne... Isaac Crawford
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanne... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmsc... Julian Robinson
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon... Dave King