On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 07:39:48 -0700 shAf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Afterall, did we ever blame enhanced Tri-X grain on the point source > enlarger we preferred for sharp detail and increased contrast? The odd thing is that this doesn't happen - at least no more than printing on a harder grade of paper provides. I did this some years ago: match the image contrast and you cannot see any difference even using a magnifier (same lens, same neg, same enlarger, different head). You do get less cack showing up from the diffuse head though. I put the condenser head away in a box as a result of this test, and it has stayed there ever since. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- RE: filmscanners: New Nikon performance shAf
- Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Arthur Entlich
- filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon perform... Isaac Crawford
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon per... Derek Clarke
- RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon... shAf
- RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New N... Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New N... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon... Isaac Crawford
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New N... Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: ... Isaac Crawford
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: ... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanne... Julian Robinson
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon per... Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon per... Arthur Entlich
- filmscanners: Was New Nikon performance, now ... Isaac Crawford
- Re: filmscanners: Was New Nikon performan... Dave King
- RE: filmscanners: Was New Nikon performan... Dan Honemann