[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Isaac Crawford) wrote: > Rob Geraghty wrote: > > > > Dave wrote: > > >Nikon scanners. Specifically, I'd like to find out whether scans > > >performed *without* ICE on the new scanners have the same problems > > >with excessive dust and scratches as on the old scanners, or if this > > >has been improved, and if so, by how much. > > > Hmmm... was the scanner *adding* the dust and scratches? I would rather > have a scanner that gets as much info off of the film as possible, and > if there are dust and scratches on the film, they should be resolved... > I'm funny that way...;-) > > > Isaac In a sense you could say that the Nikon scanners do add dust and scratches! To be exact any dust and scratches that are there are emphasised because of the LED light source that they use.
- filmscanners: New Nikon performance Dave King
- RE: filmscanners: New Nikon performance shAf
- Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Arthur Entlich
- filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon per... Isaac Crawford
- RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon... Derek Clarke
- RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New N... shAf
- RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: ... Derek Clarke
- RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: ... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New N... Isaac Crawford
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: ... Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanne... Isaac Crawford
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanne... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmsc... Julian Robinson
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon... Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon... Arthur Entlich