In a message dated 6/18/2001 6:59:21 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> Are you suggesting that the LS-40 represents better value (less resolution
>  and D-Max, but also less expensive), or that the differences in
>  resolution/D-Max are so small as to be insignificant, or that this scanner
>  has less bugs than others and so is worth the trade-offs in res/D-Max?  Or
>  all of the above?

It's a good value, and the difference in resolution/D-Max isn't significant
for what I scan.  If you want to scan things larger than 35mm, use a slide
feeder or scan mainly slide film or ISO 50 film (none of which I do myself),
then you might make different tradeoffs.

Regards,
Ed Hamrick

Reply via email to