Peter wrote:
>I think there is only one happy scanner owner, Ed, in this forum.
Yeah, but he gets to play with *all* of them! That would make me happy, too,
if I had a tenth the energy that Ed seems to have. ;-)
All seriousness aside, *most* of us are happy (or "stuck"), but we see room
for improvement. Unfortunately, we see it a lot sooner than the scanner
manufacturers do! That's why it would *also* be nice to see more Ed's,
David's, Lo's and Jack's on this List.
I think if I had to have a drum scanner, my whole project would have gone by
the bye. I paid $400-US for my scanner by the way. Could it be better? Yes.
Could *I* be better? Oh, yeah. That's also what this list is about. :-)
Best regards--LRA
>From: "Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: filmscanners: Time to upgrade: Opinions wanted
>Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 20:56:43 -0400
>
>I think there is only one happy scanner owner, Ed, in this forum. He is not
>using it mainly for slides though. The rest of people probably own drum
>scanners or do not own scanners at all.
>
>I would expect more input from people owning scanners in $600-$1500 price
>range.
>
>It is unfortunate.
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
