I am a very happy LS-30 Nikon owner, and get great results with NS 3.1 and Vuescan with negatives that I shoot. If I was to upgrade anytime soon, it would certainly be to the Nikon 4000, I would point new users to a used LS-30 or a Coolscan IV, unless they could splurge for a 4000. The only drawback to the LS-30, is the somewhat limited performance on high contrast slides, and with a 4000, I would be tempted to shoot positive film more. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 8:56 PM Subject: Re: filmscanners: Time to upgrade: Opinions wanted > I think there is only one happy scanner owner, Ed, in this forum. He is not > using it mainly for slides though. The rest of people probably own drum > scanners or do not own scanners at all. > > I would expect more input from people owning scanners in $600-$1500 price > range. > > It is unfortunate. >
- Re: filmscanners: GEM Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: GEM Norman Quinn
- Re: filmscanners: GEM rafeb
- Re: filmscanners: GEM Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: GEM Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Time to upgrade: Opinions want... Ron Carlson
- Re: filmscanners: Time to upgrade: Opinions wanted EdHamrick
- RE: filmscanners: Time to upgrade: Opinions wanted Dan Honemann
- Re: filmscanners: Time to upgrade: Opinions wanted EdHamrick
- Re: filmscanners: Time to upgrade: Opinions want... Peter
- Re: filmscanners: Time to upgrade: Opinions ... Edwin Eleazer
- Re: filmscanners: Time to upgrade: Opinions ... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Time to upgrade: Opinions wanted Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: Time to upgrade: Opinions want... Peter
- RE: filmscanners: Time to upgrade: Opinions ... Dan Honemann
- Re: filmscanners: Time to upgrade: Opini... Steve Greenbank
- filmscanners: On dust tflash
- RE: filmscanners: On dust Frank Nichols
- Re: filmscanners: On dust Isaac Crawford
- RE: filmscanners: On dust Frank Nichols
- Re: filmscanners: On dust Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.