You may be right. The commercial drum scanners are much more flexible and complex allowing for very subtle adjustments and corrections via much more complicated software that often requires a trained, accomplished, and experienced scan master to make full use of - sort of like a pressman on an offset press. Most prosumer scanners and software allow for as much control as does the drum scanner hardware and software; and most prosummers do not want to take the time to learn the steep learning curve involved in mastering the ins and outs of such control.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael > Kersenbrock > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 5:22 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital photography > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Secondly, some artifacts produced in the scanning process by > prosummer > > scanners operated by layoperators may not be readily remedied or > correctable > > at all in some cases. > And I'm sure THEY don't want to do any corrections, even if possible. > > Mike K. > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------------- > Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe > filmscanners' > or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message > title or body ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
