Johannes Gebauer wrote: > (checking Tie End has no effect, and the > next time I call the dialog the checkmark has disappeared. >
Tie Ends are simply not the answer for 2nd endings (or codas) and they never have been. A tie end only appears at the beginning of a system. Those who suggest using them for 2nd endings are misconstruing Finale's purpose for them, which is (and *only* is) to be a continuation for a tie across a system break. The only reliable solution is a shape expression. Some users may object that this shouldn't be necessary, but I say such objections are pointless. Shape expressions work very well for the purpose, and tie ends do not. Accept it and move on. With such a simple solution in place, I for one hope Coda won't spend any further development time on it. -- Robert Patterson http://RobertGPatterson.com _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
