At 01:49 PM 11/12/02, Crystal Premo wrote:
>I was taught that unless it is marked otherwise, changing the time signature
>from 4/4 to 2/2 cuts time in half, making the quarter notes go twice as
>fast. Finale does not play it back this way, though, so my guess is that
>the real convention is that if you mean to cut time in half, you must add
>some other marking. What would that marking be?
For a performer, as David Bailey suggested, you need to put a little
quarter = half marking on top of the staff. For Finale to play back
correctly, you also need to define this expression for playback so that the
tempo changes appropriately.
Of course, you'll also need a half = quarter marking when you go back to 4/4.
This is why I suggested that, if possible, you turn your two 2/2 bars into
two 2/4 bars -- no tempo change necessary.
Aaron.
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
- Re: [Finale] 4/4 to 2/2 Mr. Liudas Motekaitis
- Re: [Finale] 4/4 to 2/2 Linda Worsley
- Re: [Finale] 4/4 to 2/2 Doug Auwarter
- RE: [Finale] 4/4 to 2/2 Christopher BJ Smith
- Re: [Finale] 4/4 to 2/2 David H. Bailey
- Re: [Finale] 4/4 to 2/2 Crystal Premo
- Re: [Finale] 4/4 to 2/2 Aaron Sherber
- Re: [Finale] 4/4 to 2/2 Linda Worsley
- Re: [Finale] 4/4 to 2/2 David H. Bailey
- [Finale] 4/4 to 2/2 Crystal Premo
- Re: [Finale] 4/4 to 2/2 Aaron Sherber
- Re: [Finale] 4/4 to 2/2 Crystal Premo
- Re: [Finale] 4/4 to 2/2 Darcy James Argue
- Re: [Finale] 4/4 to 2/2 Aaron Sherber
- Re: [Finale] 4/4 to 2/2 David H. Bailey
- Re: [Finale] 4/4 to 2/2 Crystal Premo
- Re: [Finale] 4/4 to 2/2 David H. Bailey
- Re: [Finale] 4/4 to 2/2 Andrew Stiller
- Re: [Finale] 4/4 to 2/2 Crystal Premo
- Re: [Finale] 4/4 to 2/2 Crystal Premo