Le mercredi, 18 déc 2002, à 19:54 America/Montreal, helgesen a écrit :

Situation 1:
Horns, 4 measures rest either side of a rehearsal mark. "Extract parts"
produces an 8 measure multi rest, with no reh'l mark. OK it's easily
fixable- (Break multi rest- create 2x4 multi rests either side of reh'l
mark). But surely theres a way of making Finale (2001) recognise the reh'l
mark on extraction? Yes? No?
Yes. I assume that your rehearsal mark is made with the expression tool. So when defining the character and font of the rehearsal mark, check the « break multimeasure rest » box. You should do it in your score long before you prepare it for extracting parts.

Situation2;
Horns, (again!) sustaining note for 9 measures. Apply "number repeated
measures" plug-in. Measure 2 of sustain is numbered 1, and last measure not
numbered. So I get numbers 1---7 on measures 2---8.
I can see why- strictly speaking first and last are NOT repeated measures,
because first is not tied to previous note, and last is not tied to
following note, and it is 'kludgeable'- remove ties, enter numbers, replace
ties. But surely this should be do-able? Some sort of mandatory "Number
these measures- do as your told- don't argue!"
I think this is the normal behavior of that feature. You play the first measure, and then you count the number of repeats of that same measure.

Eric Dussault

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Reply via email to