Re: [Finale] Changing key sigs without courtesy naturals - a good idea?

[Giz Bowe]

I believe I was the first in this thread to use "aesthetic" in regard to 
engraving, and want to clarify that I did NOT use it in a negative, ironic 
or derogatory way. I should let Jim O'Briant speak for himself, but my 
guess is he also doesn't use "aesthetics" in a derisive way, as he is a 
music publisher.

Thanks for not misunderstanding!

At 11:53 AM 5/25/03, you wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James O'Briant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> But I stand firmly against notation "gimmicks" for purposes of style or
> engraving aesthetics or the like.
What  composers do is one thing, but what engravers do is another. One can 
argue about the pros and cons of various engravers' "aesthetics"--a word 
apparently meant to deride--but the fact is all of them exist for the sole 
purpose of rendering the music easier to read.
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale