At 12:56 PM 8/4/03 -0400, Darcy James Argue wrote: >It was pretty clear from the context -- at least to me -- that Giz's >original question involved a jazz transcription. At least, that was >the underlying assumption behind what Chris and I said.
I hadn't kept the original post, so I wasn't sure. I just remembered something about a transcription being edited, and didn't recall what the style was -- and after reading a few posts, that little mental bell rang that said "transcription" and I thought "maybe early music transcription." Definitely jazz transcriptions want to know the beat and the syncopation, so I heartily endorse the rule for that work -- though not necessarily for jazz/Latin transcriptions where syncopation of an underlying, repetitive rhythm can be more simply notated without ties. Dennis _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
