Yes, I can certainly understand the screen rotation problem. On 31.12.2003 18:40 Uhr, Robert Patterson wrote
> The thing is, I'm still more productive in OS9. U.I. doodads are uninteresting > to me in themselves, so I'm happier in OS9 when doing real work. Expose (which > I don't have) sounds incredibly useful for OSX, but the OS9 Finder needs it > less than the OSX Finder does. (The OS9 Finder compensates in two > interdependent ways: one is that when you click on a window, all windows for > that app come foreward. One can argue the pros and con of this, but it does > make the Expose functionality less necessary, especially > when combined with the other OS9 compensation: the application pulldown in the > upper right corner.) You know, when I started to use OS X I had similar complaints. (BTW I believe there is freeware out there to get your application menu back in OS X). Exposé is a bit of a different horse, but I will not start this again. What makes OS X desirable for me is the stability, it simply runs much more stable than any OS 9 release I have ever used. I was just curious what was keeping you in OS 9. I personally found the switch much harder than I hoped for the first two years, where I had OS X installed but hardly ever used it, because I couldn't connect to it. Now with Panther this has changed, and I can't even put my finger on the exact reasons for that. I am beginning to really like OS X. Johannes -- http://www.musikmanufaktur.com http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
