I can't think of a specific example, but I'm almost certain I've seen a repeated accidental after a shift to/from 8va. Probably where the second occurence was an upbeat to a new phrase. IMO, not to give a new accidental when the visual position of the note has changed would be a confusing approach.


Richard Huggins wrote:


> I'm doing a piano score. I have a situation where the displayed notation on
> beat 4 is identical to beat 1 in the same measure, notes which have
> accidentals. Due to the use of 8va in the earlier case but not in the
> latter, the second occurance would be played at a different point on the
> keys. Because of this, is there any precedent for repeating the accidentals
> on the second occurance? The composer has it this way, but he is prone to
> occasionally random markings and he frees me to edit as well as engrave.
>
> --Richard
>
> _______________________________________________
> Finale mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
>


_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to