Since you have good luck with diskettes, I guess you probably use better quality diskettes, take good care of them, and store them properly.
On the other hand a failure rate of 50% on Zip disks is indication that something is not right. I've rarely seen Zips go bad, and when I have seen it happen it usually seems to be the fault of a bad drive.
-Carl Donsbach
--On Wednesday, April 21, 2004 10:48 AM -0400 Dennis Bathory-Kitsz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 10:38 AM 4/20/04 +0200, Johannes Gebauer wrote:Just be careful, floppies are _very_ unreliable for backups.
I've heard this said, but I started using floppies in 1980 (TRS-80 and Color Computer), and even those are still readable nearly a quarter-century later. A friend who still has a working 5-inch drive has been transferring my old articles with no trouble, so I know they're still good. My 10-year-old PC-based floppies are still fine; I have one machine with a legacy floppy drive still working, and I've been transferring material to CDR to consolidate it.
I've had worse luck with Zip disks (50% failure over time with these!), CDRs, and hard drives than I ever had with floppies.
What gave rise to the idea that floppies were unreliable? Is it just because they tended to be stored badly? Or was it a system-dependent recording method?
_______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale