David W. Fenton wrote:
But this is because I recognize only two valid interpretations for 6/4, 2/H. and 6/Q -- and my reason for eliminating 3/H is because I can't see a reason for using 6/4 to indicate what 3/2 clearly indicates without the confusion of the compound time signature.
But what about when somebody wants to indicate three sub-groups of two crotchets, where the crotchet pulse remains dominant? Ot's hardly an unimaginable situation. What alternative would you recommend?
_______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
