on 7/22/05 2:17 PM, David W. Fenton at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > And I definitely believe that the "no female tenors" rule is more > justifiable than the "no countertenors singing alto" rule. The former > is, at least, historically appropriate.
So we can sexually discriminate based on a history determined by sexual discrimination? That might not hold up in a court of law. ;-) Don Hart _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
