On 10 Aug 2005 at 17:58, Darcy James Argue wrote: > I forgot to add, when addressing someone's question, lots of people > reply to the replies (not the original), so even if the list was > configured to automatically reply-to the individual as well as the > list (which it isn't), digest subscribers _still_ wouldn't see many > responses to their queries until the next edition of the digest is > published.
Well, that's their choice, now isn't it? Why would you want to make life more difficult for Digest readers by suggesting that no one should bother trimming their quotations? What does it cost you to agree that cutting quotations to the minimum is A Good Thing? Or how can you argue that it is a bad thing just because you personally believe that nobody should be subscribed to the Digest? That would be like me asking MakeMusic to remove the features I don't use in Finale just because I can't see why anyone would need them (e.g., Simple Entry). -- David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton David Fenton Associates http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
